Back to top

Directors Cut

Ross Bell MOS

Ross Bell
Executive Director

Download this edition

I am calling bullshit on the current hysteria about meth-contaminated houses. It’s an overcooked issue resulting in punishment for people already in precarious social circumstances.

Let’s quickly clear something up. 
I’m talking about so-called contamination from meth use, not from manufacture. That’s a different issue involving volatile and toxic substances nobody should
 be around.

But what are the exposure risks in a home where meth has just been smoked? Our good friend and National Poisons Centre toxicologist Dr Leo Schep says the risks are actually minimal – similar for people who live in a house that had previous dwellers who smoked cigarettes or cannabis.

The fear around real risks from meth labs has exploded onto meth use, and testing companies are exploiting this to scare up business. Housing New Zealand (HNZ) has jumped on this bandwagon, happily wasting taxpayer dollars.

I’m less fussed about the money (testing and remediation represents about 5 percent of the total HNZ maintenance budget), but I’m seriously concerned about the social impacts of evicting a family based on unreliable testing and overstated risk assessments.

Recently, for example, a mother and her eight children were evicted from their HNZ home after a positive meth test. Their emergency accommodation was costing her $1200 per week on top of her existing $60,000 debt to Work and Income. I’m not condoning her meth use, nor will I judge her, but there is nothing right about this picture. Punishing the most vulnerable seems to be a new national sport.

You would think that, when it comes to vulnerable families, HNZ would employ some procedural rigour before terminating a tenancy. You’d be wrong. There are no formal meth testing standards and any cowboy’s shonky ‘evidence’ can be used to evict tenants, leave them with massive cleaning bills or even demolish their houses.

HNZ’s heartless response compares poorly with the Government’s National Drug Policy which calls instead for compassion. In the case above, couldn’t HNZ have provided a health intervention
for the mum’s meth use and kept her with her family in stable accommodation? God only knows the impact that eviction will have on those children.

Don’t think this is going to get better any time soon. Standards New Zealand has been funded to develop new rules around testing and remediation of meth-contaminated properties. Half the committee members convened for this purpose are commercially involved in testing and clean-ups – the same people riding this meth scaremongering wave.

Much is at stake here, so we need more independent voices to inform this issue. And Housing New Zealand and other social service providers need to show more heart when working with tenants who use drugs.

Ross Bell
Executive Director

+ see more
Children with alcohol protest signs

Where are we at with alcohol reform?

Read More
Long shot of UNGASS meeting attendees

Hopes dashed and raised in NYC

Read More
school shoes

To test or not to test

Read More
Cannabis with measuring guage

The snowball and the avalanche: medical cannabis in Australia

Read More
James K Baxter

Drug history: James K Baxter: poetry and political influence

Read More
Illustration of blue pill wrapped in barbed wire

Guest editorial: Substance Addiction Bill briefing

Read More
Sydney street sign: 1.30am lockouts pubs bars and clubs

Viewpoints: Introducing lockout laws

Read More
Tuari Potiki speaks at UNGASS

Opinion: Telling it like it is

Read More
Australian Greens leader Dr Richard Di-Natale

Q&A: Dr Richard Di Natale

Read More
Sign behind fence: Drugs free school zone

Mythbusters: gangs target middle class kids

Read More
Share:
e substance newsletter promotional thumbnail
Subscribe to email updates

Get regular news, analysis and commentary on drugs issues in New Zealand. Free.

Sign up now!

DF WebAd DrugHelp 4
DrugHelp

Online support resource if you or someone you care about is struggling with drug use

Visit DrugHelp