[ Skip to main content ]
< Back to all stories

Festival drug checking trial: Summary of results (2017)

2 Jul 2017
This article was published 7 years ago. Content may no longer be relevant.

During the 2016/2017 summer festival season, we helped community group KnowYourStuffNZ offer free drug testing to more than three hundred festival goers. The results of this testing were analysed and what we found told us that drug checking can reduce harm and might save lives.

KnowYourStuffNZ volunteers tested 330 substances at 8 festivals using reagent testing. Additional analysis using an  FT-IR spectrometer was offered at 3 of those festivals.

Over three quarters of people thought they had MDMA or LSD, but in reality only two thirds were either of these. Instead, a total of 39 distinct substances were detected.

thought versus actual

20% of samples contained none of the drug people thought they’d bought, and another 11% contained unexpected additional ingredients. If the substance was not ‘as advertised’ it was most commonly a cathinone, known as “bathsalts” - these are a highly unpredictable, potentially toxic type of new psychoactive substance within a group sometimes called research chemicals.

31%

of the drugs tested were not what people expected.

When the drug was not at all what they expected or was adulterated with an unexpected psychoactive substance, over half said they planned not to use it, potentially averting serious harm.

 

Pie graph showing the proportion of people that intended to take a substance when it was NOT what they thought

The impact on people’s behaviour was significant with more considered and safer decisions being made after people discovered that what they had was NOT what they thought.

63%

said they wouldn't or maybe wouldn't take the substance after finding out it wasn't what they thought it was.

If people decided they would still take the substance, the reason was usually that they had tried it before, or that they had had the unexpected substance before. However, people often commented that they intended to be more cautious based on the new information they had. 

Share:

Topics

Share:

Recent news